Considering Alternatives to the Resurrection
Considering Alternatives to the Resurrection
Since the heart of the Christian claim is that Jesus rose again from the dead (1Cor 15:1-17), let's take some time to think through other possible explanations.
THE SWOON THEORY
Jesus did not actually die on the cross but simply fell into a coma. Later he revived in the tomb and was seen alive after his resurrection.
Some years ago the Journal of the American Medical Association studied this issue closely, and they concluded that the information provided in the Gospel accounts makes clear that Jesus died on the cross: “On The Physical Death of Jesus Christ” www.godandscience.org/apologetics/deathjesus.pdf. See also Gary Habermas' exhaustive treatment of this subject in, On The Resurrection, and Did Jesus Really Rise From The Dead: A Surgeon-Scientist Examines the Evidence by Dr. Thomas Miller.
This hypothesis isn’t consistent with the facts presented in the earliest reports. For example, if Jesus merely survived his crucifixion, he would be unable to walk (Lk 24:15, 50, Jn 21:13) or stand (Mt 28:9, Lk 24:36, Jn 20:26, 21:4) on the third day. This theory also doesn’t explain reports of his “startling” the disciples by suddenly appearing or vanishing (Lk 24:36, Jn 20:26, Lk 24:31), or his ascension (Lk 24:50, Jn 20:17, Acts 1:2-11, 2:33-34, Eph 4:10, Heb 4:14, 1Pt 3:21-22).
This explanation doesn’t account for the soldiers guarding the tomb. Would they have allowed the disciples to carry Jesus away on a stretcher?
This doesn’t account for the conversion of Jesus’ own family members. In John 7:5, we’re told that “not even his brothers believed in him,” and according to Mk 3:21, members of his family “were saying, ‘He is out of his mind.’” And yet, according to both Josephus (Ant. 20.9.1) and various passages in the NT (Acts 15:13, 21:18, Gal 1:19, 2:9, Jas 1:1), Jesus’ brother James did become one of the pillars of the Christian movement in Jerusalem before he was martyred for his faith around 62 AD. This cries out for explanation (cf. Acts 1:14, 1Cor 15:7).
Paul was another hostile witness, but this theory doesn’t explain his conversion which he claimed was rooted in a personal encounter with Jesus (Acts 9:1-7, 22:6-9, 26:9-19, 1Cor 15:8-9). Therefore, if the swoon theory is correct, we must dismiss Paul’s report as a fabrication, and provide a motive for his deception, for which he faced beatings, imprisonment, and ultimately, martyrdom.
How are we to explain the amazing correspondence between the predictions of the Hebrew prophets, and the events that later came to pass? For example, Isaiah not only foretold that Israel’s messiah would atone for sin (Is 53:5) by his own sacrificial death (Is 53:8-9) and triumphant resurrection (Is 53:10-12), but also that he would subsequently be worshipped by Gentiles around the world (Is 9:7, 11:10, 42:1, 6, 49:6, 52:10, 15, 60:3, 61:9, 62:2). Daniel predicted that the Messiah would come to Israel and be “cut off” (Dan 9:26, cf. Is 53:8) before the destruction of Jerusalem (Dan 9:26). The Messiah’s kingdom would ultimately “fill the whole earth” (Dan 2:35) and would “never be destroyed” (Dan 2:44).
THE LOOKALIKE THEORY
Jesus died, but someone who looked like Jesus (perhaps his twin ?) later claimed he rose again from the dead. Alternatively, someone who looked like Jesus was perhaps killed in his place. A form of this view appears in the Koran: “They never crucified him—they were made to think that they did” (Sura 4:157-158).
Thomas, who was called “the Twin” (Jn 11:16, 20:24, 21:2), refused to believe in Jesus’ resurrection unless he could see and touch Jesus’ wounds (Jn 20:24-30). In other words, because he had a twin brother of his own he wanted to make sure that the one who had appeared to the other disciples wasn’t a mere lookalike, but bore the scars of crucifixion.
The theory doesn’t account for the conversion of Jesus’ own family members who would certainly be aware of a twin brother, and who presumably would be able to distinguish Jesus from lookalikes.
By itself, this theory does not account for reports related to the empty tomb, Jesus’ ascension, Paul’s supernatural encounter, etc., without multiplying hypotheses.
THE STOLEN BODY THEORY
Jesus really lived and was crucified under Pontius Pilate, but sometime later, his disciples stole his body.
Though this is the oldest objection (Mt 28:11-15; Justin Martyr, Dialog with Trypho, 108), it only ends up solving the problem of the empty tomb, and many other elements of the earliest reports remain unexplained (such as the various eyewitness reports of Jesus’ resurrection appearances, the conversion of hostile witnesses such as Paul and members of Jesus’ immediate family, reports of Jesus’ ascension, etc.)
How exactly would the disciples have been able to steal the body from a well-guarded tomb? (Mt 27:65). How are we to account for their motives? Why would they be willing to suffer a life of hardship, persecution, and in some cases martyrdom (Mt 10:17-22, 23:34, Mk 13:9-13, Lk 14:26-27, 21:12, Jn 16:1), in order to perpetuate this hoax?
As with other alternative theories, this view fails to account for the astonishing parallels between the life of Jesus and the writings of the Hebrew prophets (which became the primary focus of the apostles’ preaching and teaching from the earliest days of the church (Acts 2:22-36, 3:18-25, 8:28-35, 10:43, 13:27, 17:2-11, 18:28, 26:22-27, 28:23, Rom 1:1-2, 3:21-22, 1Cor 15:3-4, 1Pt 1:10-11).
THE MISPLACED BODY THEORY
Jesus body was placed in the wrong tomb. Thus, when the correct tomb was visited, the body appeared to be missing.
This theory doesn’t fit the evidence. According to all four Gospels, Joseph of Arimathea placed Jesus in his own tomb (Mt 27:57-60, Mk 15:42-46, Lk 23:50-53, Jn 19:38-42), and according to multiple sources, Jesus’ female disciples witnessed the location of the burial site (Mt 27:60-61, Mk 15:46-47, Lk 23:55).
The tomb was guarded by soldiers (Mt 27:66). Is it plausible to suggest that they guarded an empty tomb?
Though this theory attempts to explain the empty tomb, it fails to account for the transformation of the disciples, the boldness of their proclamation in the face of persecution, the conversion of hostile witnesses, multiple appearances of Jesus, or accounts of his ascension.
THE HALLUCINATION THEORY
Jesus didn’t physically rise again from the dead, but the disciples believed that they had seen him again, either as a result of psychosis, wishful thinking, or some kind of drug-induced frenzy.
As with other theories, this explanation doesn’t explain the empty tomb, the conversion of hostile witnesses, the countless examples of fulfilled prophecy, etc.
As you examine the Gospel narratives, it becomes clear that many of the disciples doubted, but eventually, those doubts were resolved “through many convincing proofs” (Acts 1:1-3; cf. Mt 28:17, Mk 16:11, Lk 24:11, 41, Jn 20:24-29).
According to 1Cor 15, Christ’s appeared to over five hundred brothers at one time, which begs the question, “Did they all experience the same hallucination?” Paul quotes this creed at a time in which most of the witnesses were still living, and this creed goes back to the time before Paul’s conversion (for more information, read this article or listen to this episode).
THE EMBELLISHMENT THEORY
Jesus was a real historical figure, but the events of his life were not written down until much later, which by that time included numerous embellishments and exaggerations.
As mentioned above, the early creed cited by Paul in 1Cor 15 affirms belief in Jesus as Israel’s divine messiah, who died, was buried, and was raised on the third day. This indicates that the core tenets of Christian doctrine did not develop over a long period but were present from the earliest period. Therefore, the empty tomb cannot be explained as a later embellishment.
This theory also fails to account for why James became one of the leaders (and an eventual martyr) of a movement that professed the divinity of his own brother.
Was Jesus famous or not? According to Mt 4:24-25, “Jesus’ fame spread throughout all Syria, and they brought him all the sick...and he healed them. And great crowds followed him from Galilee and the Decapolis, and from Jerusalem and Judea, and from beyond the Jordan.” The word “crowd” occurs 144 times in the Gospels, and 35 times it appears with adjectives such as “great” or “large.” In one case “myriads of crowds” came to see Jesus which caused some to be trampled (Lk 12:1), and in Jn 12:19 the Pharisees say to one another, “Look how the world has gone after him.” If these reports were embellished and Jesus never had been a famous wonder worker, why did so many Jews in first-century Judea find his story compelling? Wouldn’t it be obvious that this was untrue?
See the 2nd Edition of Richard Bauckham’s widely acclaimed book Jesus & The Eyewitnesses (particularly his concluding chapter, “The End of Form Criticism”). See also John A.T. Robinson’s Redating the New Testament, and Jonathan Bernier’s Rethinking the Dates of the New Testament, for compelling arguments that all four Gospels (as well as all other NT documents) were written before the fall of Jerusalem in 70 AD.
Shane Rosenthal is the founder and host of The Humble Skeptic podcast. He was one of the creators of the White Horse Inn which he also served as host from 2019-2021, and he received an M.A. in Historical Theology from Westminster Seminary in California.
FOR FURTHER STUDY & REFLECTION
To watch a lecture on this topic by Cambridge New Testament scholar, Peter J. Williams click here. To see his presentation, “New Evidence the Gospels Were Based on Eyewitness Accounts,” click here, and to see his debate with Bart Ehrman, click here.
If you’re interested in a scholarly presentation of this subject from a Christian perspective, I’d recommend N.T. Wright’s, The Resurrection of the Son of God. For a non-Christian perspective, see Geza Vermes’, The Resurrection: History & Myth.
For more information about the early Christian creed from 1 Corinthians 15, listen to: The Gospel Creed. For more information about seeing the Jesus story as a myth that essentially evolved over time, listen to: The Jesus of History, Faith Founded on Fact (1), and Faith Founded on Fact (2).
If you find it difficult to sort through the differences in the resurrection narratives, I’d recommend John Wenham’s book Easter Enigma. I also discussed this topic with Dr. Lydia McGrew here.