“Is it not written in your Law, ‘I have said you are Gods’ ? If he called them Gods, to whom the word of God came — and Scripture cannot be set aside — what about the one whom the Father set apart as his very own and sent into the world? Why then do you accuse me of blasphemy because I said, ‘I am God’s Son’? Do not believe me unless I do the works of my Father. But if I do them, even though you do not believe me, believe the works, that you may know and understand that the Father is in me, and I in the Father.”
The churches with their definitorious and assumptive talk about created and uncreated and godly and human and angelic natures (as if they knew) to establish their doctrine are simply wrong.
What is with those who will be like him and sons (heirs) of God with him?
What is with the אחד ΕΝ that He called his disciples (Jh 17) as Moses called Israel to be with God?
What is the purpose of establishing a doctrine that would never have been established such by Paul or John, and wasn't by Him?
Would He have separated the Father from his spirit, his forces from his arm and finger?
No. They do, to separate man from God. That is the history and the guilt of the churches, as it was the fault He found with the Ioudaioi (Phar., Sadd., Sages/Scribes) in the day of his inspection and call to Israel.
Listening to this on Spotify made me take out a paid subscription - a mind-blowing progression of the earlier episode discussing "Jesus as face of God". Transformed my perspective on the OT - and frankly, everything.
Why do you think he said this:
“Is it not written in your Law, ‘I have said you are Gods’ ? If he called them Gods, to whom the word of God came — and Scripture cannot be set aside — what about the one whom the Father set apart as his very own and sent into the world? Why then do you accuse me of blasphemy because I said, ‘I am God’s Son’? Do not believe me unless I do the works of my Father. But if I do them, even though you do not believe me, believe the works, that you may know and understand that the Father is in me, and I in the Father.”
The churches with their definitorious and assumptive talk about created and uncreated and godly and human and angelic natures (as if they knew) to establish their doctrine are simply wrong.
What is with those who will be like him and sons (heirs) of God with him?
What is with the אחד ΕΝ that He called his disciples (Jh 17) as Moses called Israel to be with God?
What is the purpose of establishing a doctrine that would never have been established such by Paul or John, and wasn't by Him?
Would He have separated the Father from his spirit, his forces from his arm and finger?
No. They do, to separate man from God. That is the history and the guilt of the churches, as it was the fault He found with the Ioudaioi (Phar., Sadd., Sages/Scribes) in the day of his inspection and call to Israel.
Listening to this on Spotify made me take out a paid subscription - a mind-blowing progression of the earlier episode discussing "Jesus as face of God". Transformed my perspective on the OT - and frankly, everything.
So glad to hear! Thank you so much for supporting my work!