It is the disciple whom He had especially valued (by entrusting his mother to his care). Perhaps this αγαπη was attributed (later) to this fact more than to him being put above all others (because of some hidden merit). I am not saying Jesus should have treated them all alike and be as close as to every other. We would perhaps say that one was especially honored. That in ancient language, however, would imply a deserved position. The αγαπη was different. It was a guving of value and regard for someone especially.
bravo. This is just SO well presented, and touches on SO many important issues that go WAY beyond the primary question of who wrote the book of John. I could go on an on, but I'll just repeat and sigh ... bravo.
*giving
It is the disciple whom He had especially valued (by entrusting his mother to his care). Perhaps this αγαπη was attributed (later) to this fact more than to him being put above all others (because of some hidden merit). I am not saying Jesus should have treated them all alike and be as close as to every other. We would perhaps say that one was especially honored. That in ancient language, however, would imply a deserved position. The αγαπη was different. It was a guving of value and regard for someone especially.
The fact that John was entrusted with the care of Jesus’ mother is I think the best explanation for his being identified as the “beloved disciple.”
bravo. This is just SO well presented, and touches on SO many important issues that go WAY beyond the primary question of who wrote the book of John. I could go on an on, but I'll just repeat and sigh ... bravo.